Late in the year of 2013, protesters in the Ukrainian capital descended upon Independence Square, also known as Maidan, to voice disapproval against the government’s latest decision.
After years of negotiation and months of promises their government under President Viktor Yanukovych, at the last moment failed to sign a major trade agreement with the European Union.
The square, located close to the government buildings, fast became an iconic site of protest. The students were the first to arrive. These were the Ukrainians with the most to lose, the young people who unreflectively see themselves as europeans and who wished for themselves a life and a country close to the european model. Many of them were politically minded, some of them radically so.
When the riot police came and beat the students, a group of Afghan veterans also came to Maidan. These middle aged men, former soldiers and officers of the Red Army, came to protect “their children”, the best of the youth, the pride and future of the country. After the Afghan veterans, hundreds of thousands of others joined in, but now not so much in favour of a future in Europe but in defence of decency and demanding change.
The protesters represented every group of Ukrainian society: Russian speakers and Ukrainian speakers, people from the cities and the countryside, people from all regions of the country, members of all political parties, the young and the old, Christians, Muslims, Jews and Atheists. The diversity of the Maidan was impressive.
By mid January, the government tried to put an end to Ukraine’s civil society by passing a series of laws without following normal procedures and removing the few remaining checks on executive authority. For the people on the streets, this was an attempt to turn Ukraine into a dictatorship and make all participants in the Maidan, by then numbering in the hundreds of thousands, into criminals. The result was that the protests, until then mostly peaceful, became violent. Yanukovych started losing support even in his political base in the southeast close to the Russian border.
Around the barricades erected on the streets that give access the square, piles of tires and wood would now burn 24 hours a day. The high columns of flames and smoke filled the skies at night in a quasi-apocalyptic scene tinted by a dramatic orange glow. A visual spectacle complemented by the frozen icicles formed by the police water cannons captivated the lenses and imagination of photographers and videographers covering the event and their audiences around the world.
After weeks of responding peacefully to arrests and beatings by the riot police many Ukrainians had had enough. A fraction of the protesters, some but by no means all representatives of the political right and far right, decided to take the fight to the police and tensions in Maidan reached a high point on February 20th. A day that would be remembered as one of the most violent in Kiev’s recent history.
The Square was in flames with protesters and riot police standing off over the future of the country. Protests were ongoing for more than two months now but events were about to come to a head. In the early hours of that morning dozens of protesters armed with nothing more than clubs, rocks and handmade metal shields advanced towards the police in direction of the parliament building. Retreating security forces and unknown snipers from surrounding buildings started shooting and by the end of the day more than 50 people were killed, the heaviest death toll of the clashes between protesters and security forces in the Maidan.
The violence would lead to the downfall of Ukraine’s pro-Russian president and the following day Viktor Yanukovych fled Ukraine.
The images in this project, ’Kiev Fiery Protests’, are a collection of photographs shot in around Maidan’s iconic barricades since the beginning of the revolt in late 2013 till the dramatic turn of events of February 20th. A day that would send Ukraine into a deep political instability, territorial divisions and a vicious war with no end in sight. [Official Website]
Legal Note: The photographer attest that have full authorization to give consent to the publication of these photos or project and have the authorization and permissions of third parties. Guarantees that you have all the necessary communications of property and you have obtained all the necessary authorizations for any property, buildings, architecture, structures or sculptures appearing in your photographs.